We’re taking on two new partners this quarter.
All case studies
  • Health & wellness
  • Functional drinks
  • Google Ads
  • Meta Ads

Spending less, selling more

A young brand on a lean budget needs every bit of it to count. We found where the money was leaking and put it to work.

  • +66%Revenue across Google and Meta, June to August 2026 against the same months in 2025On 8% less spend
  • 6.8xReturn on Google ad spendUp from 2.8x
  • +57%Revenue from MetaOn almost exactly the same budget

The challenge

For a young brand in a fast-moving category, any budget spent on ads that don’t pay their way is budget that can’t go on stock, product or people. This brand was working with a lean monthly budget across Google and Meta, so every bit of it had to earn its place.

What we did

  1. Followed the money.

    Almost half of the previous year’s Google budget had gone to campaigns that brought back barely more than they cost, about 1.1x. We switched them off.

  2. Backed what was working.

    We moved the budget into the two campaigns that were already earning, brand search and Performance Max, and grew them by around 45%. Brand search improved from 5.5x to 7.5x, and Performance Max from 3.3x to 5.8x.

  3. Rebuilt Meta with new campaigns.

    We held the budget almost exactly where it was, so every gain had to come from doing things better.

The results

Google Ads, June to August 2026 against the same months in 2025
MeasureChange
Ad spend27% lower
Conversions+44%
Revenue+75%
Return on ad spend2.8x to 6.8x+140%
Cost per conversion49% lower
Meta Ads, same periods
MeasureChange
Ad spend+4%
Purchases+40%
Revenue+57%
Return on ad spend1.9x to 2.9x+51%
Cost per purchase26% lower
Both channels together
MeasureChange
Ad spend8% lower
Revenue+66%
Blended return2.3x to 4.1x+80%

Where the Google budget went

June to August, with the 2025 Google budget set to 100. In 2025, almost half of it sat in campaigns returning about 1.1x. In 2026, all of a smaller budget went to the campaigns that worked.

  • Campaigns we kept and grew
  • Campaigns we switched off
Show the numbers
CampaignsYearBudget (2025 = 100)ShareReturn
Campaigns we kept and grew20255050%4.5x
Campaigns we kept and grew202673100%6.8x
Campaigns we switched off20255050%1.1x
Campaigns we switched off2026NoneNoneNo spend

Less in, more out

Google and Meta together, June to August, with 2025 set to 100.

  • 2025
  • 2026
Show the numbers
Measure20252026
Ad spend10092
Revenue100166

In context

The typical return for health and wellness brands is 1.4x on Meta and 2.1x on Google (Triple Whale global medians, August 2025 to July 2026). This brand reached 2.9x on Meta, about double the median, and 6.8x on Google, more than three times it.

What this means

Every gain here came from the budget the brand already had. We found the money that was being wasted and moved it somewhere it could work.

Against the industry benchmark

  • This brand
  • Health and wellness median
Show the numbers
ChannelThis brandMedian
Meta2.9xThis brand, June to August 20261.4xHealth and wellness median
Google6.8xThis brand, June to August 20262.1xHealth and wellness median

How we measure: Ad results are as reported by Meta Ads Manager and Google Ads for the periods shown, using each platform’s standard attribution settings. Revenue means the purchase value each platform attributes to its ads, and return on ad spend (ROAS) is that revenue divided by ad spend. Website conversion rate is the share of visits to the brand’s website that ended in a purchase. To keep our clients’ figures private, we show changes as percentages and returns as multiples, rounded, rather than revenue or spend. Benchmarks are global medians published by Triple Whale (Meta Ads benchmarks, Google Ads benchmarks) for 1 August 2025 to 31 July 2026, covering more than 40,000 brands on Meta and 21,000 on Google. Measurement methods differ, so treat the comparisons as a guide. Every brand is different, and past results don’t guarantee future performance.

What it means for you

Working with a lean budget? Let’s put every bit of it in the right place.

Next case study

See all four
  • Tech & gadgets
  • Meta, Google and website

Reach that turned into revenue

A tech and gadgets brand grew revenue from Meta prospecting by 585% in eight months, with Google up 365% and a website that converts twice as well.

  • +585%Meta prospecting revenue in eight months
  • 2xwebsite conversion rate
Read the case study: Reach that turned into revenue

Where’s your brand right now?

  • 30 minutes, free
  • On Google Meet
  • With one of our specialists

Preview mode: the diary is simulated and nothing gets booked.